News
Damages for future economic loss are awarded in the form of a lump sum rather than an income stream. An integral component of valuing these lump sums is the discount rate used to bring future cash flows to present values. This article summarises the statutory discount rates prescribed under Australian jurisdictions.
In Hawkins v Lindsley (1974) the High Court held that the Court of Appeal in New South Wales could not prescribe a discount rate to be followed by trial judges. Seven years later, in Todorovic v Waller (1981), it decided that it should prescribe a discount rate in the interests of predictability and securing uniformity and the following statement was issued.
"In an action for damages for personal injury, evidence as to the likely course of inflation, or of possible changes in rates of wages or prices, is inadmissible. Where there has been a loss of earning capacity which is likely to lead to financial loss in the future, or where the plaintiff's injuries will make it necessary to expend in the future money to provide medical or other services, or goods necessary for the plaintiff's health or comfort, the present value of the future loss ought to be quantified by adopting a discount rate of 3% in all cases, subject, of course, to any relevant statutory provisions. This rate is intended to make the appropriate allowance for inflation, for future changes in rates of wages generally or of prices, and for tax (either actual or notional) upon income from investment of the sum awarded. No further allowance should be made for these matters."
Although it was intended that the 3% rate should apply only so long as economic conditions remained unchanged and though there have been considerable economic changes since 1981, the court has not reviewed its ruling.
Legislatures in all states and in the Northern Territory have modified the effect of the discount rate decision in Todorovic v Waller. Some have done so for all accident types; others for some types only or have different rates for different types. The following section sets outs our understanding of the discount rates, as at August 2008, applicable under different circumstances.
| Jurisdiction | Workers' compensation | Transport accidents | Professional and public liability |
| New South Wales | 5%1 | 5%2 | 5%3 |
| Northern Territory | n.a | n.a4 5%5 |
5%6 |
| Queensland | 5%7 | 5%8 | 5%9 |
| South Australia | 3%10 | 5%11 | 5%11 |
| Tasmania | 3%12 | 7%13 | 7%13 5%14 |
| Victoria | 3%15 n.a16 6%17 |
6%18 | 5%19 3%20 |
| Western Australia | 6%21 | 6%21 | 6%21 |
The information displayed or given on this website is of a general nature and does not take into account any person's objectives, financial situation or needs. Cumpston Sarjeant makes this material available on the understanding that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use. Before relying on the material, users should carefully evaluate the source, accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance for their purposes and should obtain appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.